ATransC Membership Physical Phenomena Journal Research Big Circle Articles Theory Best practices Techniques Examples FAQ Media Watch Resources Links
Dhtml Menu Samples by Vista-Buttons.com v4.5.0
 

Media Watch for August 2006

(Issue 57)

 


 

The Circle of Elders is a free service providing practical advice and guidance from empathetic volunteer seniors. “Elder Wisdom Circle: advice from those who care” is a Nationwide Network comprised of volunteer seniors aged 60-97 who ask to be thought of as grandparents to the cyber-world. Elders participate individually from their home computers or collectively at senior community centers. There are around 250 “Dear Abby” Elders who respond to more than 2,000 questions a month. Questions range from relationship issues to the meaning of life. Elders must be at least 60, fill out a questionnaire and go through a screening process. The Elder Wisdom Circle website is www.elderwisdomcircle.org and we hope that there are some Spiritualist Elders out there that will join this wonderful nonprofit effort.

 

A Cure for the Blues? Self-help guru Byron Katie says, “Don’t believe bad thoughts about yourself.” For the past 20 years, Katie has been showing people how to lead stress-free lives using a technique she calls, “The Work.” The Work involves four questions you ask about a painful belief:

1. Is it true?

2. Can you absolutely know that it’s true?

3. How do you react when you think that thought?

4. Who would you be without that thought?

Katie’s tough love message that all suffering is optional rubs many mental health professionals the wrong way, but Time voted her one of its Spiritual Innovators for the 21st century. To find out more about The Work, you can read her bestselling book, I Need Your Love—Is That True? How to Stop Seeking Love, Approval and Appreciation and Start Finding Them Instead.

From: AARP, “Quit Your Pain,” by Mark Matousek, May/June 2006

 

Scientists Propose Alternative View of Mind: Reviewing a recent article by J. M. Schwartz et al. in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, John Paynton noted in the Paranormal Review that there have previously been two prevailing views about the nature of mind. In one, mind is a by-product of matter. In the second, mind and matter are the same and mental states are identical with brain states. In both, the mind cannot influence the body. According to Poynton, “Schwartz et al. asserts that in clearly specified circumstances, mind can be shown to have an independent and causally effective existence; terms such as feeling, knowing and effort are intrinsically mentalistic and experiential, and ‘cannot be described exclusively in terms of material structure.’ Consequently their ‘quantum model of the human person’ is ‘essentially dualistic, with one of the two components being described in psychological language and the other being described in physical terms.’”

 

Poynton noted that this article being written by such highly respected scientists and published in such a highly respected journal may go a long way to change the prevailing view of mainline scientists.

From: “President’s Note on Revolutionary Science,” Paranormal Review, Society for Psychical Research, January 2006. Reviewed Article: “Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: A neurophysical model of mind-brain interaction,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 2005.

 

What We should always ask: Apart from a few notable exceptions, C. D. Broad was one of the very few professional philosophers of his day to take a serious and active interest in psychical research. He identified three important questions which need to be asked when investigating any claim of a supernormal event.

1. Did the reported event really happen, and is the description of it which the witnesses gave completely accurate?

2. If so, can it be accounted for in terms of the already known laws and properties of matter and of mind?

3. If it really did happen as reported, and if it cannot be accounted for normally, can we suggest any plausible supernormal explanation of it? And can we test our explanation by further observations or experiments?

From: www.survivalafterdeath.org/news.htm

 

Face Appears on Woman’s Grave: Howard Taylor first

Clement Britt/Times-Dispatch

 

 noticed a face-like image on the marble pattern below his wife, Virginia’s, mausoleum nameplate two months after her death. Perhaps the facial pattern’s most striking feature is its right eye. Virginia Taylor’s right eye drooped and the marble pattern reflects this.

 

Taylor feels that his wife is looking over him and says that he didn’t want to tell many people at first because he was afraid that they would think he was nuts. Dean Bruce, a counselor at the cemetery said, “It’s not just any face. It looks like his wife … no one can believe it. We’ve never seen anything like it.”

 

The mouth is just below the horizontal line and the right eye is just above it at the left. The face is seen as she may have looked if you stood beside her while she was lying down.

From: Times Dispatch, “On crypt’s marble, husband sees the face of his late wife” by Paige Akin, www.timesdispatch.com

 

Questions For Skeptics: The problem with James Randi and his foundation on the paranormal, pseudoscientific and supernatural, by Skylaire Alfvegren, Las Vegas Weekly, 1-27-6. In his article published to coincide with a skeptic’s conference in Las Vegas, Alfvegren points out that, “Dogmatists of any stripe are fundamentally wounded, whether they’re Islamic terrorists, Christian abortion-clinic bombers or magicians with an ax to grind.” He compares the negative approach taken by Randi and his followers, as opposed to the Fortean Society who “…are neither gullible nor pompous, neither ‘true believers’ in—nor coldly dismissive of—anything. And they have a sense of humor largely missing from Randi’s crowd.”

 

Skeptics, of which Rani’s group is but one, have become widely recognized as being religiously against just about any form of non-traditional science or belief. It is as if they seek to maintain the status quo—even to the point of “debunking” hard science that does not conform to mainstream standards.

 

As Alfvegren wrote, “‘In and of itself,’ says a man once denigrated by the skeptical movement, ‘skepticism has made no actual contribution to science, just as music reviews in the newspaper make no contribution to the art of composition.’”

 

Most Christians Don’t Believe in the Body’s Resurrection: The findings of a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll, done in February and March, surprised and dismayed some of the nation’s top theologians since it put American’s beliefs in conflict with both the Nicene Creed and the Apostles’ Creed, ancient statements of Faith meant to unify Christian belief. The Nicene Creed, adopted in 325 concludes with the famous words: “We look for the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen.” Similarly, the Apostles’ Creed professes a belief in “the resurrection of the body.” Only 36% of the 1007 adults interviewed answered yes to the question; “Do you believe that, after you die, your physical body will be resurrected someday? 54% did not believe this and 10% were undecided.

 

Al Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY, is quoted as saying “…Christianity being taught in so many denominations … has produced a people who simply do not know some of the most basic Christian truths.”

 

The poll found that those surveyed believe in other major elements of Christian teachings. Over 90% said they believed in a God or a Supreme Being and 65% said that they were “absolutely certain” that God existed. Over 70% said they believed in an afterlife in which they would have “some sort of consciousness,” but less than half were “absolutely certain” of this. A Scripps Howard poll in 2003 found that 63% were “absolutely certain” that Jesus died and physically rose from the dead and 60% “absolutely believed” that Jesus was born of a virgin mother.

 

ATransC Media Watch

Index of articles

Some articles are in multiple indexes so you may need to use the "Back" button

 

Media Watch: Index

 

01-August 2001
02-September 2001
03-November 2001
04-December 2001
05-January 2002
06-February 2002
07-June 2002
08-July 2002
09-August 2002
10-September 2002
11-October 2002
12-November 2002
13-December 2002
14-January 2003
15-February 2003
16-December 2003
16-March 2003
17-April 2003
18-May 2003
19-June 2003
20-July 2003
21-August 2003
22-September 2003
23-October 2003
24-November 2003
26-January 2004
27-February 2004
28-March 2004
29April 2004
30-May 2004
31-June 2004
32-July 2004
33-August 2004
34-September 2004
35-October 2004
36-November 2004
37-December 2004
38-January 2005
39-February 2005
40-March 2005
41-April 2005
42-May 2005
43-June 2005
44-July 2005
45-August 2005
46-September 2005
47-October 2005
48-November 2005
49-December 2005
50-January 2006
51-February 2006
52-March 2006
53-April 2006
54-May 2006
55-June 2006
56-July 2006
57-August 2006
58-September 2006
59-October 2006
60-November 2006
61-December 2006
62-January 2007
63-February 2007
64-March 2007
65-April 2007
66-May 2007
67-June 2007
68-July 2008
69-August 2007
70-September 2007
71-October 2007
72-November 2007
73-December 2007
74-January 2008
75-February 2008
76-March 2008
77-April 2008
78-May 2008
79-June 2008
80-July 2008
81-August 2008
82-September 2008
83-October 2008
84-November 2008
85-December 2008

 

 

 

Supporting ATransC

How to Advertise

 

Community Involvement

Help improve these articles

ATransC is a publicly supported organization. Members do all of the heavy lifting when it comes to financing the operation and making this website available for you. But you are the public as well and our mission is to bring this information to you as clearly and correctly as possible.

You can help by letting us know if you find a typo or something that grammatically does not make sense. Use the comment tool where provided and let us know how we can improve articles.

We are always happy to receive constructive input.

Report Typos

 

 
 

Donate to ATransC   |   Pledge   |   Top   |   Contact the Association TransCommunication

Creative Commons LicenseUnless otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License