ATransC Membership Physical Phenomena Journal Research Big Circle Articles Theory Best practices Techniques Examples FAQ Media Watch Resources Links
Dhtml Menu Samples by Vista-Buttons.com v4.5.0
 

Media Watch for May 2004

(Issue 30)

 


 

Statistical Corroboration of Psychic Abilities. Jessica Utts is the author of Seeing Through Statistics.” She recently gave a talk at the University of California, Davis, in which she discussed the surprising degree that scientific testing corroborates the existence of certain psychic abilities. Utts has appeared on numerous television programs, including 20/20, Larry King Live and Nightline. She is an authority on statistical issues related to parapsychology and was involved with a panel in the 1990s that made an assessment of the CIA’s Star Gate program. The Star Gate program investigated possible uses for extrasensory perception. The panel’s conclusion was that the experiments had shown statistically significant evidence that could support the existence of psychic abilities. Utts calls the results intriguing and said, “If similar data had been obtained in a less controversial area, there would be no problem with accepting that the phenomena were real.”

 

Statistical Testing of Mediums. Tricia Robertson and Archie Roy have spent the past five years statistically testing the skeptical hypothesis that, “All medium’s statements are so general that they could apply to anyone.” One experiment was carried out using 440 participants and 10 mediums. The data showed that the odds against chance that the skeptical hypothesis was correct were millions to one. Subsequent experiments were done under strict protocol that eliminated body language, verbal responses and many other factors. Tricia Robertson told The Psi Review that, “We maintain that we have a repeatable experiment, providing the protocol is adhered to and good mediums are used.” From: www.sspr.org.uk/overview_3.htm

Comment: An experimental difficulty experienced by most psi researchers is that the human factor is difficult, if not impossible, to quantify or standardize. We know of no way to make the term, “good mediums,” measurable over a broad population. Even a person known to be a reliable medium, is capable of having a “bad day.”

 

Debate on Telepathy. The Royal Society of Arts in London was the scene of a debate between Lewis Wolpert, a well known British spokesperson for science and Rupert Sheldrake, biologist and author of Dogs that Know When Their Owners are Coming Home, and Other Unexplained Powers of Animals, over the existence of telepathy. Past DPE reports have covered many of the ideas of Sheldrake.

 

Sheldrake presented some of his own research. This included information on people knowing who is going to phone them, on dogs knowing when their owners are coming home and on the telepathic bond between a woman and her parrot. He told the audience that billions of people have had these types of experiences.

 

Wolpert called telepathy a “pathological science” based on tiny, unrepeatable effects backed up by fantastic theories and said that, “An open mind is a very bad thing – everything falls out.”

 

The audience seemed to side with Sheldrake. One woman voiced the opinion of many in the audience who felt Wolpert did not know the evidence, and many in the audience said that they felt Wolpert was “unscientific.”

 

From: Audience charmed by the Paranormal by John Whitfield, Nature News Service/ Macmillan Magazines Ltd. 2004

 

Demonstration of Mediumship on British Television Violates Broadcast Code. The Independent Television Commission (ITC), which is now Ofcom (Office of Communications), has determined that “Crossing Over,” with the American Medium John Edwards and “6th Sense,” with the British Medium Colin Fry, are in breach of its Programs Code. The ITC further stated that the programs which mediums “purported to be making contact with the spirit world and passing on messages to members of the studio audience” - were in breach of section 1-10 of the Commissions Program Code. The actual code states:

1.10 The Occult and ‘Psychic’ Practices
Actual demonstrations of exorcisms and occult practices such as those involving supposed contact with spirits or the dead, are not acceptable in factual programming except in the context of a legitimate investigation. They should not, in any case, be shown before the watershed.

 

Horoscopes, palmistry and similar ‘psychic’ practices are only acceptable where they are presented as entertainment or are the subject of legitimate investigation. They should not include specific advice to particular contributors or viewers about health or medical matters or about personal finance. They should not be included at times when large numbers of children are expected to be watching.

 

Fiction programs containing ‘psychic’ phenomena should not normally be scheduled before the watershed, although a fantasy setting, for example, may justify such scheduling.

From: January 2004 Psychic World

 

Comment: This is clearly a “Freedom of Religion” issue that is not restricted to the UK, for it seems clear that the thinking which has made such rules possible overseas likely exist in the USA. We also note that the phrase, “… except in the context of a legitimate investigation,” leaves the determination of what is and is not a “legitimate investigation” open for interpretation. As investigators, we know that any poorly understood phenomenon is subject to a struggle between establish thought and new evidence as the dominant paradigm is challenged and eventually changed. OfCom’s Rule 1-10 potentially makes it difficult for the British to demonstrate the principles of Spiritualism in a public forum and helps to assure that only “scientists” are able to present a case for or against survival.

 

Father Calls after Dying. The Rev’s Betty and Don Nauratil, co-pastors of the Spiritualist Church of Two Worlds in San Leandro, CA had been helping a friend whose husband was making his transition. The time was close and the man’s three sons came to be by his side. He crossed to the other side at 9:33 in the morning. The family was together and talking at 10:05 when one of the son’s cell phone rang. The cell phone displayed the Fathers cell phone number. Shocked the son quickly disconnected the call.

 

The family went to the kitchen as they remember placing the fathers turned off cell phone there. The phone was located and was indeed turned off and there was no one else in the house. Just as they had located the phone the second son’s cell phone rang. Once again the Father’s cell phone number was displayed. This time the son picked up the call and stayed on the line. All that could be heard was static or white noise.

 

Although the family does not belong to the Spiritualist church, they have learned many Spiritualist concepts from their friends the Rev’s Nauratil. The wife called Betty and Don to tell them of this phenomenal occurrence. For many, the experience could have been frightening but because of this families knowledge the event was seen as a confirmation of life after physical death.

 

 

ATransC Media Watch

Index of articles

Some articles are in multiple indexes so you may need to use the "Back" button

 

Media Watch: Index

 

01-August 2001
02-September 2001
03-November 2001
04-December 2001
05-January 2002
06-February 2002
07-June 2002
08-July 2002
09-August 2002
10-September 2002
11-October 2002
12-November 2002
13-December 2002
14-January 2003
15-February 2003
16-December 2003
16-March 2003
17-April 2003
18-May 2003
19-June 2003
20-July 2003
21-August 2003
22-September 2003
23-October 2003
24-November 2003
26-January 2004
27-February 2004
28-March 2004
29April 2004
30-May 2004
31-June 2004
32-July 2004
33-August 2004
34-September 2004
35-October 2004
36-November 2004
37-December 2004
38-January 2005
39-February 2005
40-March 2005
41-April 2005
42-May 2005
43-June 2005
44-July 2005
45-August 2005
46-September 2005
47-October 2005
48-November 2005
49-December 2005
50-January 2006
51-February 2006
52-March 2006
53-April 2006
54-May 2006
55-June 2006
56-July 2006
57-August 2006
58-September 2006
59-October 2006
60-November 2006
61-December 2006
62-January 2007
63-February 2007
64-March 2007
65-April 2007
66-May 2007
67-June 2007
68-July 2008
69-August 2007
70-September 2007
71-October 2007
72-November 2007
73-December 2007
74-January 2008
75-February 2008
76-March 2008
77-April 2008
78-May 2008
79-June 2008
80-July 2008
81-August 2008
82-September 2008
83-October 2008
84-November 2008
85-December 2008

 

 

 

Supporting ATransC

How to Advertise

 

Community Involvement

Help improve these articles

ATransC is a publicly supported organization. Members do all of the heavy lifting when it comes to financing the operation and making this website available for you. But you are the public as well and our mission is to bring this information to you as clearly and correctly as possible.

You can help by letting us know if you find a typo or something that grammatically does not make sense. Use the comment tool where provided and let us know how we can improve articles.

We are always happy to receive constructive input.

Report Typos

 

 
 

Donate to ATransC   |   Pledge   |   Top   |   Contact the Association TransCommunication

Creative Commons LicenseUnless otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License