| |
4Cell Protocol for EVP
Abstract
An effective way to use EVP as a research tool for studying
etheric to physical influences is to organize a team of people who can
work together to conduct single Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP)
recording sessions. Based on the success of the
4Cell EVP Demonstration, it is thought that a small group of people
strictly following a predetermined experimental protocol can reasonably
expect to record specific responses to questions.
The Protocol
Each cell consists of four people:
-
A Requester
who thinks of a request to be given to cooperating etheric
communicators. A request may be a question, such as, "Who was my
favorite teacher?" or a request for action, such as, "Please tell
the Receiver what I am wearing now." The request can also be a
research question, such as, "What happens after the moment of
physical death?" The request should be specifically of interest to
the Requester. The Requester tells the Sender the request but not
the answer or expected response. The Requester should be the person
who holds the objective of each round of the protocol. This may be
the research leader or a person responsive to the research leader.
-
A Sender
who is given the request and then conveys it to his or her etheric
communicators, asking that they send the requested information to
the Receiver. The Sender does ''not'' communicate the request to the
Receiver. This may be accomplished in any way the Sender feels will
work. Part of the process in a 4Cell experiment is to allow the
participants to invent a way that "seems" right. Since so much of
EVP experimentation is intuitive, personal initiative may be more
effective than constraining rules. If there is doubt as to how to
proceed, we advise that the Sender meditates or contemplates the
question with the intention that it be sent. The idea is to send the
message psychically, but to also send it verbally and maybe even in
writing. All are effective techniques for EVP. The Sender then
notifies the Receiver that a request has been "sent."
-
A Receiver
who conducts an EVP session asking to record the response to the
Requester's question. The Receiver should be experienced in
recording for EVP, have a fairly high expectation of recording an
EVP in each session and have experience in hearing and understanding
EVP. Since the energy required for trans-etheric communication is
(possibly) limited, the Receiver should be the only one conducting
an EVP session for any particular cycle, and should not know the
content of the request, but only know that a request has been made.
If the Receiver finds EVP in the resulting recording, the
recording(s) are sent to the Scribe.
-
A Scribe
who accepts the EVP, if any, from the Receiver and makes a first
determination as to what it says, if possible. The Scribe then asks
the
Requester
for the request
and expected answer, and posts the that in a private email
sharing group so that the other three members of the Cell are able
to listen to the EVP and determine which might be a fit for the
request. The results of this collaboration, along with a
standardized report of the proceedings, is then posted on the Idea
Exchange for peer review. The Scribe should have experience in
hearing and understanding EVP.
It is advisable to use a listening panel to help determine
the relative quality of resulting utterances.
Considerations
-
Cell members may
be anywhere in the world, as the communication is usually via email,
and the Receiver does not conduct a recording session until the
Sender has notified him or her that the request has been "sent."
-
For research, we
recommend that the members be dedicated to a set schedule for rounds
of the protocol; however, an average of one round per month is
normal for volunteer, casual experimenters.
-
Since Cell
members are usually scattered around the country, it is impossible
to physically supervise the experimental cycles, so many experiments
by many different Cells over may months should provide dependable
"proof" of the concept, even though individual results should be
judged on a case by case basis.
-
In the event that
one of the four members is temporarily not able to participate, the
function of Receiver and Scribe can be combined. But separation
between the
Requester
and the Sender is required to address the
possibility that the
Requester
is asking something that is
emotionally charged. This also separates the expected response from
the send/receive process. The reason we are asking the Scribe to
independently decide whether or not the request has been correctly
responded to is to see if he or she is able to arrive at that
conclusion without "group think" unconsciously guided by the
Requester
. Even so, a listening panel would solve that problem.
-
The protocol does
not require a specific type of question or method for obtaining the
EVP, except for the controls of who knows what, when, who attempts
to record the EVP and who makes the first interpretation of the
results. The reason for this is that the group dynamics are as much
an interest to us as are the resulting EVP. One of the predictions
is that a harmoneous group will have better results than one that
experiences internal conflict. The concept is that the rapport of
mutual cooperation builds the kind of etheric/physical energy
necessary for etheric to physical influences. Another term for this
is "Contact Field."
|
|
|
| |
|
Supporting ATransC
|
Community Involvement
Help improve these articles
ATransC is a publicly supported
organization. Members do
all of the heavy lifting when it comes to financing the
operation and making this website available for you. But
you are the public as well and our mission is to bring
this information to you as clearly and correctly as
possible.
You can help by letting us know if you
find a typo or something that grammatically does not
make sense. Use the comment tool where provided and let
us know how we can improve articles.
We are always happy to receive
constructive input.
|
|
|
|
atransc2009-banner.gif){kind=spacer}
